|
PRELIMINARY
OBSERVATIONS ANS REFLECTIONS
My
aim is to astronomically decode this site solely based
on the information con-tained in André Müller's
research work. Hence, I would like to make a number
of remarks in this respect before proceeding:
1-
The work contains no information on the position of
the main witnesses in the circles, a factor which helps
enormously when it comes to astronomically decoding
the psc.
2-
On studying drawing
1 it would seem that certain areas have a
much higher con-centration of graves and incineration
remains, among which I would point out, according to
the names assigned by André Müller:
a-
The border of the triangle formed by circles A -grid's
map: F-G, I, as hence-forth- and K -F-G, III- and circle
120 -B-C, III-.
b-
The area south of circles 166 -I, IV-, 161 -H, VI-VII-,
155 -G-H, VI-VII-, 153 -G, VII- and 195 -E-F, VI-VII-,
and to the north of circles 81 -H, IX-, 105 -G, IX-,
111 -E-F, VIII- and 114 -E, VIII-IX-.
c-
The ditches corresponding to structures 185 -D-E, VII-VIII-
and 172 -D, VIII-IX-.
3-
To the south, not too far apart from one another, several
circles of an average and large diameter -5-10 metres-
therefore corresponding to stars of a 2nd or 1st magnitude.
4-
In this southern part, from N to S, the circles with
a diameter of almost 10 metres, therefore corresponding
to stars of the 1st magnitude, are as follows:
Circle
147 -G, V-VI-, measuring 10.8 metres in diameter.
Circle
195 -E-F, VI-VII-, measuring 7.5 metres in diameter.
Circle
111 -E-F, VIII-, measuring 9 metres in diameter.
Circle
81 -H, IX-, measuring 8 metres in diameter.
Circle
96 -F, X-, measuring 8.5 metres in diameter.
From
the general drawings, those specifically related to
circle 96 -F, X-, 'planche 58', and that stated in the
text, I can deduce that this circle may have had a different
diame-ter, p. 71: "La fouille semble montrer qu'il
y a lieu de croire à un certain nombre de rema-niements
modernes ...".
5-
These circles only match stars in a relatively small,
but often repeated part of the sky when it comes to
the psc, i.e. the ecliptic stretch crossing the Milky
Way from Taurus to Gemini, stretching northwards to
Auriga, southwards as far as Sirius, eastwards to Aries
and westwards as far as Cancer. However, the numerous
stars of a 1st magnitude in the area mean that Arihouat
should have a similar number of large-diameter stars
in its southern area to match them.
6-
There is no logical explanation for this within the
proven psc principles already stated in my numerous
studies except for the supposition, as an initial work
hypothesis, that the graves could have been located
in the said area, due to its being one of the 'heav-enly
doors of the souls' mentioned among other authors by
Macrobius in his 'Comments on Scipio's Dream', taken
from Cicero's 'The Republic', as reflected in Okabe.
7-
Looking at the group on the map, before visiting it
in situ, it would seem to have important geographical
features on the N-S axis towards the SE and the rising
of Sirius: to the north we have the nearby Honteyde
-1,912 metres-, Pas des Portes -1,769 me-tres-, Coume
de Herrère -1,841 metres- and Homme de Pierre
-1,616 metres-; to the south is the far-off Quayrat
-3,060 metres- and, not far from an area featuring the
outstanding Cap de Bassièret -2,296 metres-,
Hourquette des Hounts-Secs -2,046 me-tres- and the Pic
de Coume Nere -2,424 metres-, and, finally, to the SE,
we see close a line of mountains stretching from Cap
de Pouy -1,802 metres- to the Pic de Céciré
-2,403 metres-. This is said by way of an approximation
to the toponymy and, above all, to the landscape of
the area. Without geographical features, without landscape
as a con-cept, the psc would never have been conceived,
and certainly could never have been astro-nomically
decoded. I repeat once again that I have never actually
visited the site, in the endeavour to explain that theories
can be made without having done so. It's not necessary
to actually go to Arihouat to know the approximate point
at which Sirius rose, the area in which the Ursas rotated,
or the line of mountains indicating the culmination
of the stars; however, it is essential to go there in
order to exactly establish these points, i.e. to observe
the area, noting some kind of a nearby orientation or
a rock standing out against the fir-mament to emphasize
specific astronomical ephemeris, often bringing the
circles to life or making sense of the toponymies so
often repeated at great distances from one another.
up
|